Friday, June 24, 2016
GE head-only scanner in the news
In an unrelated GE web resource, MR diffusion tractography is featured as a tool for a European (but not EU, as per today's Brexit decision!) autism research. It is mentioned that machine learning from Steve Williams' team is utilized for the research. I am not sure if there is anything new on the MR side of this latest development in GE-King's College collaboration.
Sunday, June 19, 2016
Finding referees
My other problem with searching for referees is a practical one. The research community should change the way the authors are identified by their names. For Korean researchers, in particular, I have long thought that the first and the last names should be swapped in academic publications. It is simply ridiculous to ask Korean scholars to conform to the Western naming convention, which is to fully spell out the last name only, while abbreviating the first name by it initial(s). That is unfit as a global way to identify the authors. Any naming degeneracy-- now I see it first-hand-- leads to confusion in the referee selection process, and its natural consequence, sadly, is for the editorial board simply to avoid Korean researchers from the referee pool. As a numeric author ID is not likely to be liked by many, in the long run the journals should allow the authors to designate which name, first or last, should be used as a primary identifier on record.
Friday, June 10, 2016
First meeting to gear up for the next year's Korean MRI Conference
1. Imperatives: The society wants to grow more international. The ICMRI conference should attract more international registrants. In practice, this can be most readily achieved by fostering more resource exchange with Chinese and other Asian magnetic resonance communities.
2. Desirables: Expansion of mutual educational sessions between the PhD's and MD's. The former, including the PhD students, will benefit from more coherent medical case and practice reports, while the latter will appreciate better plain-language expositions of MR theories covered at the conference.
Kudos to the hands and brains of the KSMRM society!
Thursday, June 2, 2016
Susceptibility seminar
The comparison between conventional physical susceptometry and MR-based measurement interested the audience. It certainly intrigues me that MRI phase measurement can be so sensitive to small magnetic changes in the object. Having started my research career in sensitive magnetometry, I now feel like coming a full circle to undertake research on applying MRI to magnetometry.